The enslavement of thousands is a stain on the United States. The ripple effects are still being felt to this day.
Slaves were bought and sold in the northern colonies, but, by about 1800 these areas, states now in the new United States, had by and large forbidden the importing and sale of slaves. (That does not mean there were none; the slaves already present were allowed to remain.)
However, that does not mean merchants in the north were guiltless. Merchants, such as Lydia’s father, engaged in a three cornered trade in which New England businessmen took African slaves to the United States and the West Indies for work on the plantations, especially the sugar plantations.
The by product of making sugar, molasses, was shipped to New England for distillation into rum. That rum was exported to Great Britain and brought to Africa. The rum, and the profits from selling the rum, was used to purchase more slaves.
This trade was called the benign sounding Triangle Trade.
Faneuil Hall was opened in 1743 (and was the site of several speeches by luminaries such as Samuel Adams.) and was present when Rees and Lydia visited Boston in 1801.
Built by slave merchant Peter Faneuil as a gift to the town, it was funded in part by the profits from slave trading. The building was begun in 1740 with an open ground floor serving as a market house with rooms on the second floor. The National Park Service believes early slave auctions took place nearby.
The hall has been rebuilt several times. It was destroyed in 1761 by fire and was greatly expanded in 1806 by Charles Bulfinch. In 1960, Faneuil Hall was put on the National Register of Historic Places. It is still in use and can be visited.
Murder, Sweet Murder, the next Will Rees mystery, is set in Boston.
Since the birth of the United States, Boston has been one of the country’s most important cities. It was settled by the Puritans in 1630 and quickly became a trading center and hub of commerce.
During the 1770s, Boston was a hotbed of patriotic fervor. The taverns in Boston were instrumental in firing up the populace and planning. (More about that later.) The first shots were fired nearby and several battles, including Breed’s Hill, were fought within the town.
By the time Rees joins Lydia in Boston, and finally meets her family, the war has been over for twenty years.
Once the war was over, Boston’s economy recovered and the population grew significantly, so much so it went from a village to a town. Then, in 1822, the name was changed to the City of Boston.
Boston was also one of the first cities to adopt a metropolitan police force. In 1790, Boston’s population was 43,000 and the ability of night watchmen and constables to keep order and protect lives and property was already strained. The rapid growth that occurred beginning in the early 1800s, and increased with the influx of foreign immigrants, further stressed the system. In 1837, Boston established a police force modeled on the London police.
Murder, Sweet Murder, the newest Will Rees, will be released February 1, 2022.
Almost all of the series focuses on Will, his family and friends. Through the years, readers have asked for more about Lydia.
In Murder, Sweet Murder, I answer that call.
Lydia receives a frantic letter from her sister begging her to come to Boston. Their father has been accused of murdering a young man, just recently arrived from Jamaica. Marcus Farrell is engaged in the Triangle Trade. Cod is shipped to the islands for the slaves that harvest the sugar cane. Sugar is sent back to the Northeastern United States to be turned into rum. And the rum is shipped to Africa (among other places) to purchase more slaves.
Has Marcus Farrell murdered the young man? And why?
Besides Lydia’s father, Rees meets her stepmother and her sister Cordelia. He finishes the journey with a new understanding of why Lydia fled her father’s home to live with the Shakers, and now that she is married to Rees, does not miss her former life of luxury.
One of the pitfalls of writing historical fiction is the danger of making mistakes. It could be simple mistakes. In A Devil’s cold dish, I refer to a stack of hay as a bale. Balers were not invented until the early 1800s, a fact I knew. But I was trying to expand my synonyms from stack and pile and all the other words. A reader called on it immediately.
Then there was the mystery where I had Rees rewarding Hannibal with oats a few times. I immediately got pushback from a reader who accused me of giving the poor (fictional) horse colic.
These are somewhat trivial errors. More serious mistakes involve easily confirmed facts that somehow the writer (me) got wrong. In Murder on Principle, I refer to Jefferson’s opponent as John Quincy Adams. He is actually the son of the correct candidate, John Adams. This is a case of temporary forgetfulness. I knew it was John Adams but made the mistake once and it was repeated. No one else caught it, not the agent nor the editor. That was left to a reader who wrote a really harsh review.
This is what makes writing historical fiction so challenging; everything must be triple checked and even then it is all too easy to make a mistake.
Believe me, someone will know.
I must add, however, that sometimes the reader who is so sure of their facts, is wrong. I used the term ‘cracker’ in one of my books and a reader wrote a gotcha review. I, however, had done my research and had a copy of a letter written in 1763 by a British official using that exact term.
The passage of time always creates an undiscovered country.
So happy to see some good reviews for the next Will Rees, due out August 3, 2021
From Kirkus: A complex mystery that focuses on the institutional racism still sadly ingrained in the nation’s psyche.
From Publishers Weekly: The intricate plot builds to a satisfying resolution. This sobering look at the cultural divide over slavery in the early days of the Republic deserves a wide audience.
I spent most of my vacation working on edits for the next Will Rees: Murder, Sweet Murder.
It is a little amusing to be working so hard on the next in the series when Murder on Principle will not be published until August 3rd.
In this book, Rees and Lydia journey to Boston to investigate an accusation leveled against Lydia’s father. I wrote this one at the request of readers who wanted to know more about Lydia’s past.
I am so excited to present the cover of Murder, Sweet Murder. No publication date yet.
I have posted a giveaway on Goodreads for Death in the Great Dismal.
Rees and Lydia travel to the Great Dismal Swamp in Virginia to rescue their friend Ruth, a fugitive who has fled to the swamp and the protection of a village of maroons. As soon as Rees and Lydia arrive, one of the members of the village is found murdered. Rees and Lydia, as well as Ruth’s husband Tobias, are immediately suspect. To clear their names, and to leave the swamp for home, Rees investigates.
The new Will Rees, Murder on Principle
The owner of the people Rees and Lydia have escorted to safety in Maine arrives to recover the fugitives. When he is murdered, his sister and a number of slave takers arrive. Rees faces an ethical dilemma. Does he investigate and identify the murderer – who might have had very good reasons to kill the slave owner? Or does he let the murderer go free?
Murder on Principle will be released on August 3. A giveaway will be posted for the new book in July.
Read Death in the Great Dismal to prepare for Murder on Principle.
I associated the Fugitive Slave Law with the Civil War. The truth is, however, the first iteration of the law was signed into effect in 1793, long before I would have guessed. It is important to remember that many of the founding fathers, including George Washington, were slave owners.
In Death in the Great Dismal,
when Rees and Lydia rescue their friends Tobias and Ruth, they were breaking the law. Although both Tobias and Ruth had both been born free in Maine, they were abducted and sold into slavery. (The slave takers frequently took any person of color, born free or not, for sale in the South. Occasionally, white children were stolen as well.)
Not only were escaped people subject to recapture, anyone who obstructed the slave takers were considered in violation of the law. Moreover, any child born to an enslaved mother was also considered to be enslaved. The prevailing custom was one drop of black blood meant that person was considered black, no matter how light-skinned. Rees and Lydia, therefore, could have been in serious trouble if they had been caught.
The full text of the Act is available from the Library of Congress (and online) in the Annals of Congress of the 2ndCongress, 2nd Session, during which the proceedings and debates took place from November 5, 1792 to March 2, 1793.
The appropriate sections are 3 and 4.
By the end of the American Revolution all of the Northern states had abolished slavery or made provision to do so. (The United States abolished the slave trade in 1808.) However, fugitives could and were returned to the Southern states per the Fugitive Slave Act by men whose profession, if you will, was capturing escapees.
This law was further strengthened in 1850 at the request of the slave states. One of the elements most annoying to Northerners was the three-fifths rule that counted every five slaves as three people and therefore gave the slave states much more representation in Congress. Although there were abolitionists prior to 1850, the revised law caused a tremendous increase in people who identified as anti-slavery.
The term Underground Railroad did not come into common use until the construction of actual railroads became widespread. An abolitionist newspaper published a cartoon in 1844 that pictured a rail car packed with fugitives heading for Canada. Use of ‘conductor’ and other railroad terms came into broader use after the 1850 law.
